&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for July, 2009

Jul 30 2009

A breast feeding doll? Yup.

http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2009/07/babyglutton.html

 

Bye-bye Bottle: Breastfeeding Baby Dolls are Here

 

 

Bebé Glotón is a infant doll made by Berjuan, a toy maker in Spain, for the express purpose of promoting breastfeeding. The idea is to impress upon kids that breastfeeding is natural.

 

Your child wears a colorful bra-like halter-top featuring flowers over the nipple area. When the doll is lifted to the flowers, it makes a suckling motion and sound. When your child’s flower nipples grow sore and cracked, either the baby cries for more, or beckons to be burped.

The flowers don’t really get sore and cracked. My wife was astounded when I read her a draft of this article, so I thought I should clarify. If the flowers wilt a little, maybe you can buy your kid a tube of lanolin

I guess that settles the whole dolls-are-okay-for-boys issue. Or maybe it reignites the fathers lactating civil rights issue.

Here is a Spanish video report and a second video report that provide a sense of how the doll functions. The second is better, but is tucked behind a 30 second commercial.

The user comments posted below the second clip (20minutos.tv) are a hoot… with people viewing this doll as everything from inappropriately sexing up children to providing a plaything for prepubescent lesbians. But to be fair, a good number of the comments are sheer trolling. (View them by pasting the URL into a Google search, then click “translate this page”).

Babel Fish translates the doll’s name as Baby Glutton. If anyone is familiar with Spanish culture (Spain, not Latin America), I’d love to hear their thoughts about that name.

This gluttonous baby is 50 cm (19.6 inches) long, the average length of a real newborn and is available in either gender. There’s no word yet on whether the boy is anatomically correct. The dolls retail for about 44 Euros.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

 

They’re not as creepy or ugly as those real-life dolls but the concept is creepy alone. Just why should little girls be groomed into being baby making machines? These dolls do more harm than good to a girl’s self image. Why not just train a five year old to be a hooker? Oh wait a minute, we already have those, they are called child beauty pageants. My bad. Ironically, they are made in Spain. I wonder if these will be marketed in Latin America? Not to worry, most of those girls are already groomed at a young age to make lots of babies, I am sure they do not need any dolls to help them do that part. At that age, I’d stick to playing with Legos, which are a far more educational toy than some breast-feeding doll.

 

Advertise Here with Today.com

Comments Off

Jul 27 2009

Child Cannibalism Case in Texas

Published by selidororous under Bad Parenting Edit This

Squeamish alert ahead (edited for graphic content):

http://news.aol.com/article/police-say-woman-kills-baby-eats-brain/588892

Otty Sanchez, 33, is charged with capital murder in the death of her infant son, Scott Wesley Buchholtz-Sanchez. She was recovering from her wounds at a hospital, and was being held on $1 million bail.

San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said the early Sunday morning attack occurred a week after the child’s father moved out. Otty Sanchez’s sister and her sister’s two children, ages 5 and 7, were in the house, but none were harmed.

Otty Sanchez’s aunt, Gloria Sanchez, said her niece had been “in and out” of a psychiatric ward, and that the hospital called several months ago looking to check up on her. She did not elaborate on the nature of her niece’s health problems.

“Otty didn’t mean to do that. She was not in her right mind,” a sobbing Gloria Sanchez told The Associated Press on Monday by phone. She said her family was devastated.

………………………………………………………………..

This is just one more reason the federal government needs to institute some major testing of all wanna-be parents. It is not often that I have to edit a piece like this, but the facts are too graphic even for this blog. With strict psychological testing, this whole “But you’d be a great parent!”, “I want a baybee!”, and “Having a child makes you a better person!” will weed out the low-lifes who want a child for all of the wrong reasons. Eliminate every single female who has used illegal drugs, has a major chemical imbalance, has been determined mentally ill in any way, and that will save a lot of children’s lives. I’m still in favor of sterilization for such women, they have no right to have babies at all.

Comments Off

Jul 21 2009

Eighteen years old with four children. What an achievement. Not.

It gets more ridiculous by the day:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1200755/

A-mum-18-Teenager-hands-triplets-toddler.html

A mum of four at 18! Teenager has her hands full with triplets and a toddler

By Emily Andrews

21st July 2009

It’s hard enough being a teenage mother with just one child.

So when 17-year-old Sian Robbins was told she was pregnant with triplets - to add to the little boy she already had - she knew she was in for a tough time.

To make things worse, the babies - Taylor, Tyler and Levi - were born 11 weeks premature and all three boys had to stay in hospital in incubators.

Doctors had warned of complications and during the unplanned pregnancy Miss Robbins, now 18, faced the agonising choice of whether to abort one of the triplets to give the other two a better chance of survival.

But she refused, saying: ‘I knew that I faced a higher risk of miscarriage but was determined to give all three of them an equal chance.’

Luckily the gamble paid off and seven weeks after their birth all three have been allowed home.

Levi and Tyler weighed just 2lb 6oz after their birth, while Taylor was slightly heavier at 2lb 14oz.

All three were so tiny they could fit into the palm of their mother’s hand, but now they weigh 4lb each, to the delight of Miss Robbins and her boyfriend Callum Thomas, 19.

Mr Thomas said: ‘I’m delighted with my boys. Sian went into labour very prematurely and it was very traumatic.

‘It was touch and go for a time and the doctors warned me that some of them may not survive. But they pulled through and are now doing really well.

‘Taylor initially wasn’t very well as he had a heart murmur and an infection, but he’s battled through that now.’

The non-identical triplets were due on August 11, but were born on May 28 by emergency Caesarean section.

Miss Robbins added: ‘Three is a lot but I’m so pleased we’ve got all of them. It does mean a lot of work though - we get through 24 nappies, 18 bottles of milk and five loads of washing every day.’

Miss Robbins was 15 and still at school when she discovered she was expecting her eldest son Jaden, now two, but after the birth in November 2006 she returned to her studies and got four GCSEs before leaving to become a full-time mother.

She split up with Jaden’s father soon after the birth, before meeting Mr Thomas.

The family lives on benefits in a two-bedroom council house in Portsmouth but they are hoping to be given a bigger house, although they are adamant there will be no more babies.

‘We are definitely not having any more,’ said Mr Thomas. ‘The boys are sleeping and feeding very well but three babies and a two-year-old is enough of a handful.

‘I haven’t got a job at the moment as I want to stay at home and look after Sian and the kids but I will be looking for a job soon.’
…………………………………………………………………………

Oh yeah I’m sure she’ll be looking for a job soon. Chances are she’s on welfare just like the rest of the UK’s teen motherhood crowd. And triplets? Was it birth control pills, or fertility drugs in play here? The entire western world has devolved into breeder brains. And her doctors said it was a risky birth, for her life, and the life of her babies. Now is that really worth it? Shouldn’t Sian be in college majoring in chemical engineering instead of making more babies with her boyfriend? They are not even married and they have four babies between them, not to mention the fact that the present boyfriend du jour is not the father of the first child, Jaden. Nope, Sian broke up with Jaden’s dad right after the baby’s birth. Looks like the UK needs a major revolution in eliminating their welfare program for teenagers making babies. What a waste of tax dollars. Does the father of the kids, Callum Thomas, have a job? Probably not. Now I know the USA is no better when it comes to teens making babies out of wedlock and collecting welfare checks, but at least our system is not as generous as that of the UK’s. I love how Sian and Callum claim there will be “no more babies.” As if the rest of the world believes them.

Comments Off

Jul 18 2009

Children shouldn’t play with fire.

Published by selidororous under Bad Parenting Edit This

This one is a real winner:

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_12864427?source=rss

A 7-year-old Littleton boy was burned so badly in a fire Friday evening that he has been flown to the Shriner’s Hospital in California for treatment.

The boy, whose identity has not been released, received 2nd and 3rd degree burns over 90 percent of his body, according to West Metro Fire Rescue spokesman Micki Trost. The boy was transported by ambulance to Swedish Hospital, then helicoptered to Children’s Hospital in Aurora, which then made the decision to send him to California.

Investigators say they believe the 7-year-old started a fire in his family’s condominium on West Phillips Drive when he was playing with a lighter in a bedroom closet around 5 p.m. Friday.

A smoke alarm alerted his sister and mother, who ran upstairs to pull him out of the fire. The mother received burns to her hands and feet and was taken to Swedish.

Firefighters commended the 8-year-old sister, who called 911 and gave the dispatcher a detailed and accurate description of what was going on. Firefighters said they were able to respond appropriately when they got there based on her information.

The husband and father, who is in the U.S. Army, was located in Missouri and was being flown by the Red Cross to California.

The two-story structure received significant damage but the fire was contained to that unit and did not damage adjacent units. The burned unit is uninhabitable, Trost said.

Spokeswoman Trost said all parents should know that almost every fire department in the state has a free training program for parents whose children are showing an interest or fascination with fire.
…………………………………………………………………………

I wonder where the kid got the lighter from? Didn’t the parents know what the kid was doing at that hour, or were they too busy making supper? There are a lot of unanswered questions to this story. Maybe from now on the parents will keep all forms of fire out of the hands of their children. This is a very sad story and I hope the seven year old survives, but it won’t be without multiple surgeries to his skin. Let this be a lesson to parents everywhere so they don’t make a daily fail in raising their children.

Comments Off

Jul 08 2009

Pregnant? No, I don’t think so.

Time for another totally original post. While I have only been to the hospital ER for a few times during my teen and adult years, each time I was there, I would get the same phrase. One was when I was ill and had major stomach cramps (which dated back to my childhood years of a food allergy; lactose intolerance), then later on when I had some kidney stones. I should mention, the first event mentioned was when I was fourteen years old and in high school. Having no interest in boys at all at that age, being asked such a question was a bit of a slap in the face. You know, the kind that results in a raised left eyebrow by the person being asked the question. o make a long story short, X rays were taken, etc. I guess the doc was surprised to find out I didn’t have any womb lice growing. The kidney stone time was when I was in excruciating pain (they had to be surgically removed). I mean, how can a doctor in the ER ask that sort of question when someone like me is laying there, writhing in pain and wishing for a shot of morphine?

Now I know I am not the first female that these questions have been asked of in the ER. As tasteless as it is for any doctor to be asking that, how about just helping the patient figure out what the health issue is? If I mention I have a pain located in a certain part of my body, why start with the “Are you pregnant?” bit? No class. Being a nullipara, (doctors are no longer required to take Latin, just write as if their letters look like Latin) do you really think I’m with a kid? With a stomach as flat as mine, you’d think the docs would notice. But of course they couldn’t. Well, that is just one reason I do not like going to doctors or hospitals at all.

Comments Off

Jul 07 2009

Owning a private attack machine (and it’s not a pit bull, either)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31256584/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/

When babies attack: Labor pain is just the start

Parents, beware of poked eyes, broken noses, blows to the groin and more

By Jacqueline Stenson

June 15, 2009

Jacqueline Stenson

While other moms were enjoying being pampered on Mother’s Day, Hilary Wheeler Miller was nursing a broken nose that she suffered after being headbutted by her 3-year-old son.

“He stood up really fast and just plowed into my nose,” says the 40-year-old mom from Littleton, Colo.

As a result of the accident, Miller’s nose is now broken in two places and she’ll need surgery later this month to straighten it.

After an emergency C-section for her son’s delivery, Miller thought the worst of baby-induced pain was behind her. But childbirth was just the start.

Miller also got a fat, black-and-blue lip when Nicholas bit her as an infant. During a later roller-skating outing, he pulled her down and she shattered her right wrist, requiring a cast for two months. Miller also has been sickened with various illnesses that her son picked up at daycare, including strep throat, three rounds of pink eye, and a severe case of bronchitis that took months to treat.

“Never once did I imagine having a child would be hazardous to my health,” she says. Today, though, there’s an “ongoing saga of danger surrounding my life now that I have a child.”

Advice books, magazines and Web sites for new parents talk at great length about the aches and pains of pregnancy and childbirth, and the subsequent sleep deprivation and exhaustion. But beyond that, parents are more likely to learn the hard way about various other owies that babies and young children can innocently inflict.

Teeny-tiny terrors

Parents who’ve been knocked around a few times by tiny tots quickly find themselves strategizing about how to deflect flailing arms and legs, flying toys and utensils, razor-sharp fingernails and fists that tighten around strands of hair like a Vise-Grip — and then pull! They search for ways to ease the pain of strained backs from endless hours of carrying around youngsters (often only on one hip, which makes matters worse) and strained necks from gazing at baby while feeding (which is widely recommended for promoting parent-infant bonding).

And when moms and dads drop their guard and take a finger to the eye, a blow to the head or a kick to the groin, they see stars — and not little twinkling ones.

Kris Cambra was in so much pain in April when her 2-year-old son, Truman, poked her in the eye, that she went to the emergency room.

“Think of having a paper cut on your eye,” says Cambra, 34, of New Bedford, Mass., who was diagnosed with a corneal abrasion.

“The doctor used an ultraviolet light to look at my eye and then she said, ‘Yep, you have a scratch on your cornea and it’s shaped just like a fingernail,’” she says.

Thankfully, Cambra doesn’t have any lasting eye damage. But the experience has heightened her awareness of the need to stay on guard with her son, who she says is more physical and prone to tantrums and flailing than her daughter, 7, ever was. “You think, you outweigh them, you’re much bigger than them, so what can they really do to you?” A lot, actually.

Judy Ward, a pediatric nurse at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, says she’s heard about a range of child-induced injuries from parents who’ve called into the hospital’s Answer Line with questions about child health and behavior over the last 12 years that she’s fielded calls.

Her first bit of advice: “They probably didn’t mean it when they headbutted you.”

It may not always appear to make sense at the time, she says, but there are valid reasons why young children do seemingly inexplicable things, like beating up on their poor parents.

“They are, from practically the moment they are born, exploring their world,” says Ward. “Sticking their finger in your eye is no different than sticking it in an electrical socket.”

Tantrums can leave collateral damage

“Pre-verbal” children who don’t have the language skills to communicate their feelings and desires can be difficult because they get frustrated and then act out physically, Ward explains. “Biting, headbutting, tantrums, all of these things are because, ‘I want to go out and play and now you’re putting me in my car seat and I don’t want to go,’” she says. Sometimes kids want more attention or need a change of scenery.

Sometimes they absolutely must have an age-inappropriate pair of Pocahontas earrings. Just ask Sherry Gavanditti, who remembers every dark detail of an outing with her daughter Emily 14 years ago.

“My 2-year-old was fascinated with Pocahontas and decided quickly and loudly while on a shopping trip to a local Wal-Mart that she just had to have a pair of long dangly Pocahontas earrings,” says Gavanditti, 46, of Cleveland. “She was always a very sweet baby and is a wonderful young girl now, but at that time, when I removed those earrings from her tight little grasp, she screamed bloody murder with a spine-curdling ending and ripped the flesh off my right cheek with her tiny little nails like she was dangling from a 10-story building.”

The tantrum continued as Gavanditti left the store (without the earrings). In the parking lot, her daughter “spread out like a 10-foot spider to block entrance to the car and to keep from being placed into her car seat.” She screamed all the way home.

“I came home from Wal-Mart with a bloody face, a black eye and scratches all over my upper arms and chest,” Gavanditti says. “To this day, I tease my daughter about her one and only temper tantrum that almost cost me a trip to the plastic surgeon.”

Ouch! Baby’s a biter
Even infants can inflict excruciating pain to their mothers long after the recovery from childbirth. When Heather Allard’s son, Brendan, was 6 months old and teething, he used her nipples as chew toys. “He bit both of my nipples with his new bottom teeth while breast-feeding and sliced my nipples nearly clear off,” she says. “I have a scar on each one to prove it. My husband said my nipples looked like a pencil eraser breaking off.”

Now 2 and weighing in at 30 pounds, her son wants to be carried around all day. “His favorite place is to be parked on my hip,” says Allard, 40, of Pawtucket, R.I. Not surprisingly, this takes a toll. “My back and hips hurt all the time, my left arm feels like it’s going to snap off and my feet ache.”

Allard also has two girls. And like Cambra, her son is more physical — having, for instance, “headbutted me several times from every angle,” she says.

“Maybe it’s a boy thing or maybe I’m just getting old, but man, I’m in constant pain,” Allard says.

Hitting where it hurts

Dads take their hits, too, often to the family jewels.

“A couple of weeks ago my [3-year-old] son came from the side, jumped in the air, and drove his knees into my groin,” says Laurence Sampson, 43, of Denver, whose two young girls also put the hurt on him at times. “Painful, as you might imagine. Most of the time I see it coming, and just roll my leg over for protection.”

You can’t always protect yourself from these parenting accidents, but it pays to “be aware and alert,” says Dr. Jennifer Shu, an Atlanta-based spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics and co-author of “Heading Home with Your Newborn.”

“You need to try to stay one step ahead of your child,” she says. So if your baby is a grabber, don’t wear dangling jewelry. If your tot is a scratcher, keep fingernails trimmed. And if your child leaves toys on the stairs, turn on the light and look around before you walk them.

Eye pokes can be difficult to prevent, Shu says. “It’s tough because you don’t want to go around wearing goggles all the time.” But there are practical precautions such as not picking up a child who is holding a crayon or pencil.

Still, accidents will happen. And while parents may never forget some of them, especially the ones that require a trip to the ER, it’s easy enough to forgive their devilish little darlings.

Even with a broken nose, Miller, the Colorado mom, hasn’t been scared away from the possibly of having more children — “after the trauma of the nose wears off.”

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

This brings back to me a few memories of relatives and neighbors with children asking me to either “hold them” or “touch them” (I am not a touchy feely person by nature anyways, aside from not being a pedophiles [pedophiles love touching children, they do]) and that was one thing I absolutely refused to do. Tiny, iron hard limbs swinging out every which way, not to mention those sharp, pointed teeth which could easily puncture a few veins in my arms, would not be allowed anywhere near me. I have a natural gift for standing away from other people the closer people try to move to me, regardless of age. But back to the crotchnuggets in the article above. I can just imagine the pain of a woman getting poked in the eye by one of these creatures (AARGH! Womb Lice Attack!) and having to go to the emergency room for it. The fathers and boyfriends have even more vulnerable spots when it comes to babies, toddlers, and children.

Gavanditti’s story is a real nightmare, if only because it happened in public, with her cheek being torn open by her snowflake, then having the snowflake blocking the door to the car and refusing to get in. All over a pair of cheap Pocahontas earrings the kid couldn’t have. That child will discover that life is full of disappointments. But at least Gavanditti hauled the sproglein out of the store. Can you imagine what would have happened if another customer accidentally took a hit from this kid? Lawsuits among other things. Well, that is just another good reason to nevershop at Wal-Mart.

A few words about Brendan Allard: he sounds like the typical spoiled rotten sproglein who doesn’t know how to leave his mother alone for one second a day. Be carried everywhere? At the age of 2? He can walk. Thirty pounds at that age is roly poly fatso booby. No wonder he is out of control. My advice: reduce his caloric intake to only a few hundred a day, with no sugar, then he will slow down. Maybe get some exercise, too.

Comments Off

Jul 05 2009

No, health care should not cover IVF.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/26/AR2009062602805.html

Jon and Kate Plus Health Care

Would better insurance have saved this marriage?

By Liza Mundy
Friday, June 26, 2009

Poor Jon and Kate. Their marriage is over, their show on hiatus, their domestic ordeal entering a new phase of acrimony. Possibly nothing could have saved this marriage, but one thing would have made it less fragile: a mandate for health insurance to cover in vitro fertilization.

If the Gosselins, whose efforts to raise eight kids have been chronicled over five seasons on cable television, had enjoyed, and availed themselves of, ready access to IVF — the most sophisticated, controlled and expensive form of fertility treatment — they almost certainly would not have had six children at once. “Just one more baby,” is how Kate described their goal after twins. Without the added stress of sextuplets, they would have had a fighting chance at not fighting nearly as much as they did.

The price tag for health-care reform is already higher than anybody expected, so it’s probably unreasonable to think that it could include better insurance coverage for the millions of Americans who suffer from infertility. But such coverage for women of childbearing age could lower the extraordinary health-care costs associated with the birth of triplets or more. And it would even the reproductive odds, giving middle-class and lower-income Americans access to treatment that is currently reserved for the well-off or the unusually well insured.

In the United States, an estimated one out of eight couples experiences infertility, which is defined as the inability to conceive within a year or to bring a pregnancy to term. Often seen, wrongly, as the self-inflicted punishment of working women who waited too long to have children, infertility is the result of a host of conditions — age, yes, but also infections, hormonal imbalances, chromosomal abnormalities and physical blockage of reproductive passages.

It’s nearly as common among men as among women, and possibly more common among the poor than among the rich, for the simple reason that the less money you have, the less likely you are to have had access to health care that could prevent serious consequences from relatively minor infections. Having less money doesn’t keep you from seeking infertility treatment — it just means that the treatment you get is more likely to saddle you with high-order multiples, whose care you are least likely to be able to afford.

In their best-selling book “Multiple Bles8ings,” Kate describes pretty much that scenario. She and Jon met and married in their early 20s and soon were ready to start having children. She was a nurse and Jon was cycling in and out of jobs. They were hardly affluent, and Kate, who describes herself as having been “raised in an atmosphere of financial stress,” was very money-conscious. While she doesn’t detail what their health insurance covered, the couple lived in Pennsylvania, which like most states does not require insurers to cover IVF, a procedure in which egg and sperm are combined in a petri dish and the resulting embryos transferred into the uterus.

When Kate failed to get pregnant naturally, she sought out a doctor who confirmed that she had polycystic ovary syndrome, a condition in which a woman usually has problems ovulating. Kate writes that her treatment consisted of “painful injections” to stimulate her ovaries. That treatment produced twins. A year later, Kate started longing for another baby — not uncommon among mothers of multiples, who sometimes feel cheated of an ordinary newborn experience and want to try again for a singleton, which is what Kate said she wanted. Jon was skeptical, but she prevailed. This time, she saw a different specialist. They told him they did not want multiples but would not selectively reduce, a procedure in which some fetuses are eliminated through injection of potassium chloride.

The doctor proceeded with treatment, which consisted of injections of fertility drugs, or gonadotropins, combined with intrauterine insemination (IUI), a form of artificial insemination in which the sperm is injected into the uterus. (Kate likely had IUI with her first treatment as well; her book does not make it clear.)

The good thing about this treatment is that it’s relatively cheap, a couple thousand dollars compared to the more than $10,000 average cost for a single round of IVF. The bad thing is that it’s notoriously hard to control how many eggs will be fertilized. The IUI/gonadotropin procedure carries, in the words of one recent study, “an increased risk of unpreventable high-order multiple births.” And for a young woman like Kate Gosselin, the odds of having multiples with IUI only increase, according to Elizabeth Ginsburg, a physician and president of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

When the Gosselins went for an ultrasound during the treatment, they saw three, possibly four mature follicles, the cyst-like structures that cradle a developing egg. The doctor, Kate writes, told them that they would be unlikely to end up with three or four babies — an odd claim, if he made it — but said that they could forgo the insemination and try again later. They decided to go ahead. When the sonogram showed seven developing embryos (one would later disappear), Kate writes, Jon dropped to his knees.

The thing is, if they had gone straight to IVF, all of this would have been much less likely to happen. They might well have gotten twins, but they would have been highly unlikely to get six. It’s true that in the early days of IVF — the 1980s and ’90s — doctors often stuffed lots of IVF embryos into a woman’s uterus, because little was known about how many might take. The result was plenty of multiple births. Largely because of IVF and fertility drug treatments, such births in this country have increased dramatically. In 1980, only 1,337 triplets or higher-order multiples were born in the United States; in 1998, that number rose to 7,625, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

Babies born as multiples are far more likely to be premature, the health risks to infants and mother are much greater, and the toll on parents of triplets or more — “severe physical and psychological exhaustion” as one study put it — is immense. “Parents of multiples have triple the divorce rate,” Kate Gosselin claimed in a recent episode of “Jon & Kate Plus 8.” While some parents of multiples took issue with the idea that these marriages are unusually strained, even mothers of twins are more likely to experience emotional difficulties such as postpartum depression, points out Patricia Mendell, a psychotherapist and co-chair of the board of directors of the American Fertility Association. And sextuplets-plus-twins put strains of a whole new level of magnitude on parents.

In recent years, the rate of triplets and higher births has fallen slightly in the United States, thanks to the efforts of IVF doctors to reduce the number of embryos transferred. There are still outliers, such as the doctor who apparently transferred six embryos into “octomom” Nadya Suleman (two of those must have twinned, or split) but they really are, now, the exception. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine has developed voluntary guidelines saying that no more than two embryos should be transferred in the case of women under 35, and doctors should consider transferring only one. This is known as Single Embryo Transfer, and it’s becoming increasingly common in European countries where IVF is often covered by national health insurance. In this country, only a small number of states mandate insurance coverage of IVF, and at least one, Connecticut, sensibly limits the number of embryos that may be transferred.

IVF is better for the mother and better for the resulting child, and it is increasingly cost-effective. Recently, a study in the journal Fertility and Sterility showed that it often makes sense to bypass IUI/injections and go straight to IVF. In this study, couples with unexplained infertility who failed to conceive with a low-level treatment were either given IUI followed by IVF, or were fast-tracked to IVF. The fast-tracked couples got pregnant more quickly, and the overall price tag for both treatment and delivery was thousands of dollars lower in the IVF-only group. The study also points out that IVF success rates have significantly improved over the past two decades, making it more effective than IUI.

And insurance coverage is hardly the big-ticket item you might think: In Massachusetts, which mandates coverage, a 2002 study argued that the rise in the annual premium is really a matter of just a few dollars. Yet replicating Massachusetts around the country is a tall order because of the persistent public view that infertility is somehow not a legitimate disease, or that infertility patients are to blame for their plight.

Last week, advocates descended upon Washington to make their long shot case for increased insurance coverage for infertility treatments. In Congress, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) have introduced a bill that would broaden insurance coverage for IVF. Advocates should work to make the long-term benefits clear: fewer high-order multiples, healthier children, less exhausted parents.

TLC has done a lot of the legwork for them. More than 10 million people tuned in to watch the televised implosion of the Gosselin family last week. Maybe no marriage could have survived that many Us Weekly covers or that many cameras. But really, it seems to have been the burden of being “plus 8,” when all they wanted was “plus 3.” If sweeping health-care reform includes more substantial IVF coverage, TLC will have fewer candidates for its carnival sideshow offerings, but that’s a loss most of us could live with.

Liza Mundy, a reporter for The Washington Post magazine, is the author of “Everything Conceivable: How Assisted Reproduction is Changing Men, Women and the World.” She’ll be online to discuss this essay Monday at 11 a.m. ET. Submit your questions before or during the chat.

…………………………………………………………………………….

The very last thing this nation needs is health insurance to cover IVF. if comeone wants to have litters of children, they should be forced to pay for it out of their own pocket. I have no sympathy for Kate Gosselin of course, since she admitted to lusting for “just one more child” after her twins (apparently she could not handle having those kids, either.) It sucks for Kate and Jon to be so wrapped up in themselves they had to have more carbon footprints rather than adopt a needy child. Well, not too many people feel sorry for this nutty couple, but like me, do feel sorry for their kids. Also, unlike many people, I do not consider infertility to be a “disability”, since in reality it isn’t. This is a thought provoking article, though, and even though I disagree with IVF coverage in health care, it will have to be considered in Congress, especially now that we are well past 300 million people in the United States.

Comments Off

Jul 02 2009

Christians are still sexy people

Normally I don’t even read the Daily Kos but this is worth bringing up because It has been mentioned by me elsewhere:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/30/748518/-Its-ALWAYS-been-about-Sex,-NOT-the-Fetus

It’s ALWAYS been about Sex, NOT the Fetus
by thereisnospoon
June 30, 2009

As Matt Yglesias at Think Progress noted today, it is becoming difficult to take the pro-life movement seriously about its position on abortion. When the Southern Baptist Convention (the largest U.S. religious organization by numbers and political influence) and the U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops takes a strong stand not only on abortion, but also on contraception, it is abundantly clear that there is more to the pro-life position than mere concern for the welfare of a fetus. To quote Markos today:

A big chunk of the anti-abortion movement isn’t motivated by fetuses, but by sex.

But Markos actually understates the case. It’s not just a big chunk obsessed with sex rather than the fetus; it is the vast majority.

……………………………………………………………………………

It’s worth reading the rest of the article. It really isn’t that unusual for Christians, who make up a substantial portion of the anti-abortion, pro-life population, to have this attitude about sex. Of course they want the government to step into the bedroom, tell the people how to do it, when to do it (missionary position only on the full moon of every month), and not to use contraception of any kind. Well, the Roman Catholics and Quiverfull agree on that, anyways. Mainstream Protestants, especially the non-fundamentalist, non-evangelical ones, still hold to the “It’s between the believer and God” theory, which is true. They believe the government has no business getting involved in the sex lives of others. So many pro-lifers are men but of course, they can be. if men were able to get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.

Comments Off

Jul 01 2009

Father of nine deserts kids to have twins with another woman.

Published by selidororous under Bad Parenting Edit This

I saw this over at Parent Dish (which should be called Failed Parenting):

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529597,00.html

Father Who Ditched Nine Kids Via Safe Haven Law Has Twins on the Way

Tuesday, June 30, 2009
By Joshua Rhett Miller

The Nebraska man who abandoned his nine children under the state’s Safe Haven law last year is expecting to become the father of twins, FOXNews.com has learned.

Gary Staton, 37, became a single father in February 2007 when his wife, RebelJane, died of a cerebral aneurysm shortly after giving birth to the couple’s ninth child. Unable to handle the burden alone, Staton made national news more than a year later on Sept. 24 when he dropped off his children — ages 1 to 17 — at a hospital in Omaha. According to the law at the time, parents could hand children up to age 18 over to state custody without prosecution. Legislators would later amend the law to limit its reach to infants up to 30 days old.

Joanne Manzer — the wife of RebelJane’s father, Jack Manzer — told FOXNews.com that Staton informed his children last week that he’s expecting to become a father again with his new girlfriend, a woman named Gail.

“I was told she’s pregnant with twins,” Manzer told FOXNews.com. “[Staton] told them the last time he visited them in Lincoln, that his girlfriend Gail was pregnant. He even showed them the ultrasound picture.”

Staton, who could not be reached for comment for this article, declined to discuss his girlfriend’s pregnancy when the Omaha World-Herald reported on Sunday that he would become a father again. Details of a multiple birth and the woman’s name were not included in that report, but in an e-mail to the newspaper, Staton said, “Do you think I’m going to raise this one alone?”

Joanne Manzer said Staton’s seven youngest children are staying with their mother’s aunt, who plans on adopting them. The two oldest boys, she said, are living with a 75-year-old woman in Omaha so they can graduate high school. Despite the revelation that Staton will be a father again, Manzer said the children aren’t angry.

“They don’t seem to be, they’re doing fine,” Manzer said. “He goes up there for visits — they still have a connection. They kind of understood what he did, he was stressed with everything else.”

Asked if she and RebelJane’s father felt differently, Manzer replied, “It’s his life. He can do whatever he wants as long as he doesn’t hurt the kids anymore. That’s all we care about at this point.”

Manzer said she wishes that Staton had turned to his family for help instead of abandoning the children at Omaha’s Creighton University Medical Center.

“He did what he did, but we wish he had done it a different way,” she said. “If he had come to anyone in the family, we would’ve figured something out. He didn’t come to us though, and I saw him the morning he dropped off the kids.”

She said the children wouldn’t have been left in the hands of the state, if the children’s mother had survived her last pregnancy and become a single mom.

“Rebel would’ve done it different, she would’ve talked it out more,” Manzer said. “If she thought the kids needed counseling, she would’ve been on anyone’s door to keep her kids, that’s how she was. Gary’s the kind of person who doesn’t talk it out.”

In November, after its first special session in more than five years, Nebraska’s legislators revised the safe haven law to apply only to babies up to 30 days old. Gov. Dave Heineman said the original law had “serious unintended consequences” after 36 children — ranging from 1 to 17 years old — were abandoned at hospitals, including children brought to Nebraska from as far away as California and Washington. Twenty-two of the 36 children were age 13 or older, and eight were ages 10-12, according to state records.

“Revising the law to create a ‘baby safe haven’ in Nebraska does two things,” Heineman said in a statement last November. “First, it puts the focus back on the original intent of these laws, which is saving newborn babies and exempting a parent from prosecution for child abandonment. It should also prevent those outside the state from bringing their children to Nebraska in an attempt to secure services.”

The last use of the state’s safe haven law was on Nov. 21, the last day it applied to children up to age 18. A 14-year-old boy from Yolo County, Calif., was abandoned at the Kimball County Hospital by his mother, who drove roughly 1,200 miles to get there.

The boy, who was not identified, was later placed in the custody of the Yolo County Department of Employment and Social Services.

Kathie Osterman, a spokeswoman for Nebraska’s Department of Health and Human Services, said the Staton family had received more than $995,000 in government aid as of last fall, including an estimated $600,000 in food stamps and more than $100,000 in Medicaid.

Safe Haven laws have been passed in all 50 states since 1999, according to the National Safe Haven Alliance. The District of Columbia is the only place in the U.S. without such a provision.

Melyssa Cowburn, of Tacoma, Wash., said she utilized Nebraska’s Safe Haven law on Nov. 13 when she drove to Omaha to drop off a 5-year-old boy who had been literally dropped in her arms by a woman at a North Carolina Wal-Mart four years earlier.

Cowburn said the boy had been diagnosed with reactive detachment disorder and intermittent explosive disorder, conditions that can stem from parental abandonment. After several violent episodes, including attempts to set the family’s house on fire and a hammer attack on another child, Cowburn drove the boy to a hospital in Omaha. She then drove alone to her mother’s house nearby, sobbing the entire ride, she said.

“I’m not good, you know, I still miss him,” Cowburn told FOXNews.com. “But I couldn’t give my child the help he needed, and as the saying goes, if you love something, you have to let it go.”

Cowburn, who said her case was drastically different from Staton’s, called for improved child services nationwide.

“The law helped, but honestly, they need to address a lot of child service issues,” she said. “A lot of the Safe Haven kids were parents just trying to get help. It answered a need that a lot of parents had. There’s no place to put these kids that will help them.”

Cowburn’s mother, Ruth Thompson, said Nebraska’s law saved her daughter’s life after running into countless dead-ends elsewhere.

“It was a good thing because I thought [the boy] was going to kill her,” Thompson told FOXNews.com. “There’s so many kids that need a certain kind of help that the parents just can’t give.”

……………………………………………………………………….

This punk needs to be snipped. See his photo below. What female in her right mind would sprog with a guy like this? Outside of an extremely desperate female, that is. Love that name, RebelJane. Makes me wonder which motorcycle group they hang out with. Probably Hell’s Angels. Obviously neither one of them knew how to use birth control, and now that this creep wants to eliminate the memory of his first wife, wants to move on and keep breeding. How sick is that? This is proof enough that people have children for all of the wrong reasons. Nobody ever died from not breeding. Our society is getting worse and worse with the rabid breeding. We are acting worse than animals when we(sic) do that. Sterilize the guy the hard way and he’ll be much better off that way.

Photobucket

Comments Off

Advertise Here